Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Diamondback DB9, Ruger LC9, SIG 290, Kahr CM9 :: Photo Comparison


I recently had a chance to handle a Diamondback DB9 and thought I would throw it next to some other Mini 9mm's.

Clockwise from the Top Left: Ruger LC9, SIG 290, Kahr CM9, Diamondback DB9


Left to Right: Kahr CM9, Diamondback DB9, Ruger LC9, SIG 290

5 comments:

  1. That last picture puts the double barreled 1911 to shame!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Second picture order is off, for clockwise it should be lc9, 290, db9, and cm9. Doo you have a range report comparison yet?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very nice. Thank you for sharing. I did not realize how close in size these pistols where. I own the LCP and am looking at purchasing an LC9.

    ReplyDelete
  4. the LC9 should not have the pinky extension on when comparing height, the other guns don't have a pinky extension on. I grabbed a LC9 (in Philly no less) for only $270 it was sold "as new", meaning never owned but was handled a lot (the finish on the barrel hood had some ware due to slide racking to safety check. I say "in Philly no less" because here guns are usually $50 to $100 more than out side of the city. I was searching for a good deal on a Nano, but I'm happy I found my LC9. The Kahr CM9 is a great gun but is not as smooth as the LC9 in operation and the surface of the Kahr has sharp edges, where as the Ruger fells like a bar of soap. I have both LC9 and CM9,but my son took over the Kahr. Both guns run flawless with all JHPs I ran through them.

    ReplyDelete

RTB.net E-mail Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner